Firearms bill fails in Oklahoma Intercollegiate Legislature amid debate, amendments

By: Journalist Stephanie Conchas (ORU)

Rep. Noelle Brezillac (SNU).

During the 56th Oklahoma Intercollegiate Legislature’s first session, House Bill No. SNU-501,
known as the “Gun Laws Save Lives Act of 2024,” ultimately failed to secure enough votes, with
a final tally of 20 votes in favor and 31 against.

It sparked extensive debate and saw seven amendments added before moving forward.


Sponsored by Rep. Noelle Brezillac (SNU), the bill aimed to increase regulations on the
ownership, carry and transfer of semi automatic firearms in Oklahoma by implementing a permit
system, mandatory background checks and establishing an Oklahoma firearm registry.


Although the bill’s language and structure were clear, many delegates expressed confusion over its
underlying purpose, noting the proposal lacked a solid rationale to justify its introduction. The lack of clarity on the intended impact led to widespread questioning among representatives about why this legislation was needed, especially considering existing federal and state regulations on firearms.

The absence of a stated problem or justification left some delegates unconvinced of the bill’s necessity, which slowed its progress through the debate.

Several friendly amendments were introduced to improve the bill’s clarity and operational details in response to these concerns. Among these amendments, language was added to define critical terms more precisely and ensure all involved parties in firearm transactions held a license.


Additionally, the amendment added a subsection requiring new residents to comply with background checks before bringing firearms into Oklahoma. Amendments also modified the penalties section, classifying violations as misdemeanors and leaving sentencing to judicial discretion.


The bill’s effective date was extended from 90 to 365 days to allow sufficient time to implement its measures.

Although HB SNU-501 presented a solid framework, the amendments reflected the delegates’ effort to address ambiguities and operational concerns. The extensive changes also highlighted the importance of providing a clear rationale for new legislative proposals, particularly on sensitive topics like firearms.